Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans

By Ben Shapiro

During this galvanizing and alarming New York instances bestseller, “Ben Shapiro indicates as soon as and for all that the left is the one maximum resource of bullying in glossy American lifestyles” (Sean Hannity).

While President Obama and the left wish to faux that they oppose bullying with all their hearts and souls, in truth a long way darker: the left is the best purveyor of bullying in sleek American historical past. Bullying has morphed into the left’s go-to tactic, as they try and quash their competitors via worry, risk of strength, violence, and rhetorical intimidation on each significant factor dealing with the US today.

In Bullies, Ben Shapiro uncovers the easy process utilized by liberals and their neighbors within the media: bully the dwelling hell out of conservatives. Play the race card, the category card, the sexism card. Use any and each capacity at your disposal to demonize your opposition—to close them up. Then faux that such bullying is justified, simply because, in spite of everything, conservatives are the genuine bullies, and want to learn a lesson for his or her intolerance. Hidden underneath the left’s meant hatred of bullying lies a passionate love of its vulgar tactics.

Dubbed via Glenn Beck “a warrior for conservatism, opposed to those that use worry and intimidation to stifle sincere debate­­,” Shapiro takes at the leftist bullies—the so much despicable humans in the USA. via exposing their hypocrisy, he deals conservatives a fact sign in the face of what has turn into the gravest risk to American liberty: the left’s single-minded specialise in finishing political debate via bully strategies.

Show description

Preview of Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans PDF

Best Politics books

Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline

During this manhattan instances bestselling e-book, Robert H. Bork, our country's so much extraordinary conservative pupil, bargains a prophetic and remarkable view of a tradition in decline, a state in such severe ethical hassle that its very beginning is crumbling: a kingdom that slouches now not in the direction of the Bethlehem predicted via the poet Yeats in 1919, yet in the direction of Gomorrah.

Eyes on the Prize: America's Civil Rights Years, 1954-1965

The 25th-anniversary variation of Juan Williams's celebrated account of the tumultuous early years of the civil rights movementFrom the Montgomery bus boycott to the Little Rock 9 to the Selma–Montgomery march, hundreds of thousands of standard those who participated within the American civil rights stream; their tales are advised in Eyes at the Prize.

Borders: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions)

Compelling and obtainable, this Very brief creation demanding situations the belief of borders as passive traces on a map, revealing them as a substitute to be indispensable forces within the fiscal, social, political, and environmental techniques that form our lives. Highlighting the historic improvement and persisted relevance of borders, Alexander Diener and Joshua Hagen provide a strong counterpoint to the belief of an forthcoming without borders global, underscoring the influence borders have on quite a number concerns, resembling fiscal improvement, inter- and intra-state clash, international terrorism, migration, nationalism, overseas legislation, environmental sustainability, and traditional source administration.

Bomb Scare: The History and Future of Nuclear Weapons

Due to the fact that their inception, nuclear guns have expanded at an alarming price, leaving all people from policymakers to involved electorate thinking about what it's going to take to gradual, cease, or perhaps opposite their unfold. With readability and services, Joseph Cirincione provides an even-handed examine the heritage of nuclear proliferation and an confident imaginative and prescient of its destiny, offering a complete survey of the wide variety of serious views.

Extra resources for Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans

Show sample text content

Good, now not lots. that is why, Obama defined, “some of these against homosexual marriage however are against a Constitutional modification to prohibit it. non secular management don't need to settle for such knowledge in counseling their flocks, yet they need to realize this knowledge of their politics. ” Obama will get even clearer. He’s keen to just accept humans stating God within the Pledge of Allegiance. yet he’s now not ok with humans invoking God once they speak about their such a lot adored ideals. That’s simply because humans argue approximately biblical interpretation, says Obama. Obama really paraphrased a well-known 2000 e mail during which he supposedly mentioned biblical inconsistencies: “And no matter if we did have purely Christians in our midst, if we expelled each non-Christian from the USA of the US, whose Christianity may we educate within the colleges? could we pick James Dobson’s, or Al Sharpton’s? Which passages of Scripture may still advisor our public coverage? may still we select Leviticus, which implies slavery is okay and that consuming shellfish is abomination? How approximately Deuteronomy, which means stoning your baby if he strays from the religion? Or may still we simply follow the Sermon at the Mount—a passage that's so radical that it’s uncertain that our personal protection division could continue to exist its program? So earlier than we get over excited, let’s learn our bibles. parents haven’t been examining their bibles. ”2 to place it mildly, Obama is aware not anything approximately faith. to place it much less mildly, this is often moronic. First, this is often scripturally incorrect—religious Jews nonetheless don’t consume shellfish, the Talmud in actual fact says that the injunction in regards to the rebellious baby hasn't ever been invoked, and Obama’s interpretation of the Sermon at the Mount is extra in keeping with Karl Marx than with Jesus. really, this is often simply cribbing from a favored 2000 e mail that purports to debunk the Bible through announcing a few of it's been reinterpreted. The email’s silly, too. moment, and extra importantly, no matter if there's a dispute approximately spiritual interpretation, why should still that invalidate faith as a way of determining voter values? humans disagree approximately secular rationales for coverage all of the time—well, until eventually Obama’s gleaming visage moves their mind, and they’re rendered dumb by means of the brilliance of his countenance. Here’s the base line. Obama turns out to think that if we needs to all commence with out a set of values—we needs to begin with a mundane tabula rasa. Judeo-Christian believers imagine that we must always start with a standard set of biblical values—and then we will speak about even if these ideals are topic to new interpretation. this is often a fully stark difference—especially simply because these of the Judeo-Christian worldview regularly don’t begrudge others by way of their balloting justification. in simple terms secularists imagine that spiritual humans haven't any correct to debate their politics. Take, for instance, Proposition eight back. Now seriously look into the judicial ruling by way of pass judgement on Vaughn Walker, the federal pass judgement on who made up our minds that Proposition eight violated the federal structure.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.54 of 5 – based on 20 votes