Ethical Chic: The Inside Story of the Companies We Think We Love

By Fran Hawthorne

“Hawthorne offers readers an neutral photo of the problems of operating a ecocnomic corporation whereas attempting to keep a favorable company trust system…Highly recommended.”—Library Journal, starred review

Consumers are instructed that once they wear an American clothing t-shirt, leggings, denims, gold bra, or different merchandise, they appear hot. not just do they appear reliable, yet they could additionally believe strong simply because they're aiding US staff earn an honest salary (never brain that a few of these woman staff have accused their boss of sexual harassment). And while consumers wear a couple of Timberlands, they think trendy and as eco-friendly because the pine woodland they could trek through—that is, until eventually they’re reminded that this eco-friendly corporation is within the enterprise of killing cows. yet without doubt even the pickiest, so much natural, so much politically right purchasers can consider virtuous approximately procuring a tube of Tom’s toothpaste, correct? in the end, with its common constituents that experience by no means been validated on animals, this corporation has a forty-year historical past of being run through a pleasant couple from Maine . . . good, ahem, till it used to be lately obtained out by means of Colgate.
 
It’s tough to outline what makes a firm hip and in addition moral, yet a few businesses appear to have hit that magic bull’s-eye. during this age of patron activism, pinpoint advertising, and rapid info, shoppers call for every little thing from the espresso, computing device, or toothpaste they purchase. they need an inexpensive, trustworthy product synthetic via an organization that doesn’t pollute, saves power, treats its staff good, and does not harm animals—oh, and that makes them consider cool after they use it. businesses would really like to have that sort of recognition, and a handful appear to have completed it. yet do they deserve their haloes? Can a firm make a revenue doing so? and the way can shoppers steer clear of being tricked via phony advertising and marketing?
 
In Ethical Chic, award-winning writer Fran Hawthorne makes use of her business-investigative talents to research six favorites: Apple, Starbucks, dealer Joe’s, American clothing, Timberland, and Tom’s of Maine. She attends a Macworld convention and walks at the manufacturing unit flooring of yankee clothing. She visits the wooded headquarters of Timberland, speaks to shoppers who force thirty miles to get their pretzels and plantains from dealer Joe’s, and confronts the founders of Tom’s of Maine. greater than a how-to consultant for day-by-day dilemmas and moral company practices, Ethical Chic is a blinders-off and nuanced examine the combined bag of values on sale at businesses that venture a possible revolutionary image.

From the Hardcover edition.

Show description

Preview of Ethical Chic: The Inside Story of the Companies We Think We Love PDF

Best Ethics books

Case Studies in Information Technology Ethics (2nd Edition)

@ This number of forty two high quality, well-researched case reports on details and computing device ethics addresses the main salient moral problems with the data age, and illustrates the foremost issues of desktop experts and knowledge managers this present day. It engages readers who're newbies in laptop issues—and people who are extra involved—in a thrilling discovery procedure.

Firms of Endearment: How World-Class Companies Profit from Passion and Purpose (2nd Edition)

Today’s most sensible businesses get it. From retail to finance and industries in among, the agencies who realize that doing solid is nice enterprise have gotten the last word price creators. They’re altering their tradition and producing each type of price that concerns: emotional, experiential, social, and fiscal.

Getting Even: Forgiveness and Its Limits

We have now all been sufferers of wrongdoing. Forgiving that wrongdoing is among the staples of present pop psychology dogma; it's visible as a common prescription for ethical and psychological wellbeing and fitness within the self-help and restoration portion of bookstores. while, own vindictiveness commonly is obvious as irrational and immoral.

Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions

Cass Sunstein and Martha Nussbaum compile an all-star forged of members to discover the felony and political concerns that underlie the crusade for animal rights and the competition to it. Addressing moral questions on possession, security opposed to unjustified discomfort, and the facility of animals to make their very own offerings loose from human keep watch over, the authors supply a variety of varied views on animal rights and animal welfare.

Extra info for Ethical Chic: The Inside Story of the Companies We Think We Love

Show sample text content

On occasion, it’s now an chief, instead of a follower. the company site has product-by-product environmental information, together with greenhouse gasoline emissions in kilograms and tool intake for varied working modes. Greenpeace’s Casey Harrell fairly praised the corporate for instructing providers approximately much less poisonous choices. “They did most of the early-adapter costs,” he acknowledged. “They pulled the remainder of the alongside. ” It used to be the 1st corporation to forestall utilizing lead-containing displays, a pioneer in banning glass containing arsenic, and not less than a yr prior to HP and Dell in eliminating poisonous PVCs. Neither Harrell nor different activists count on Tim prepare dinner to change this development, partially simply because prepare dinner and Jobs either acknowledged as a lot. The Apple PR one who wouldn’t permit me quote her (so I’ll paraphrase) emphasised 3 parts the place, she asserted, my Portfolio. com article hadn’t given the corporate adequate eco-friendly credits: specific environmental reviews approximately each one product; removal of brominated flame retardants, PVCs, mercury, and different poisonous elements; and size of the emissions while humans use the goods, as well as the emissions from production and company headquarters. furthermore, she claimed that the corporate have been performing some of this for years. because of those efforts, and extra, Apple jumped a whopping 41 issues on weather Counts’s rating from 2008 to 2009. It in brief flew up six notches at the Greenpeace consultant in January 2010, from 11th to a five-way tie for 5th out of seventeen, then dropped 4 locations the subsequent October, after which shot again as much as fourth in November 2011. but Apple’s efforts begin from this type of low element that it nonetheless has some distance to head. It continues to be the worst-ranking electronics corporation on weather Counts’s checklist. Secrecy keeps to pull down its Greenpeace ratings. “Apple may rating extra issues at the different standards with larger transparency of its facts” concerning providers’ emissions and use of risky chemical substances, the November 2011 file stated. at the weather Counts chart, the worst scores are available an important class, that of environment targets and truly doing anything to minimize emissions—as against easily mouthing off approximately federal mandates and such. additionally, because the ICCR’s Laura Berry and weather Counts’s wooden Turner pointed out, Apple lags rival great tech agencies in permitting shoppers to come back outdated desktops for recycling. (The factor of recycling is become independent from the matter of acquiring the tantalum, coltan, tin, tungsten, and different minerals which are important elements of tech items like cellphones. a lot of those are dug up in habitats of endangered animals or conflict zones managed via vicious defense force leaders, otherwise mined in ways in which pollute the surroundings. during this controversy, Apple shines no brighter—but no worse—than the other producer. It says it truly is trying to make sure that its uncooked fabrics don’t come from areas with human rights abuses or in the course of battling.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.16 of 5 – based on 28 votes