Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books))

By Alex Callinicos

Making background is set the query - critical to social conception - of ways human brokers draw their powers from the social constructions they're interested in. Drawing on classical Marxism, analytical philosophy, and quite a lot of old writing, Alex Callinicos seeks to prevent unacceptable extremes: dissolving the topic into an impersonal flux, as poststructuralists are likely to; and treating social buildings because the mere results of person motion (for instance, rational-choice theory). between these mentioned are Althusser, Anderson, Benjamin, Brenner, Cohen, Elster, Foucault, Giddens, Habermas, and Mann. Callinicos has written a longer advent to this new version that experiences advancements considering the fact that Making background was once first released in 1987. This republication offers a brand new new release of readers entry to a massive intervention in Marxism and social theory.
Alex Callinicos, D.Phil. (1979) in Philosophy, college of Oxford, is Professor of Politics on the collage of York (UK). He has written greatly approximately Marxism and social idea. His most up-to-date books are Social conception (1999), Equality (2000), opposed to the 3rd method (2001) and An Anti-Capitalist Manifesto (2003), all released by means of Polity.

Show description

Quick preview of Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books)) PDF

Similar Political Theory books

Anarchism: A Very Short Introduction

What do anarchists wish? it sort of feels more uncomplicated to categorise them through what they do not wish, specifically, the agencies of the country, and to spot them with rioting and protest instead of with any coherent ideology. yet with demonstrations like these opposed to the area financial institution and the overseas financial Fund being blamed on anarchists, it's transparent that an evidence of what they do stand for is lengthy late.

Foucault: A Very Short Introduction

From aesthetics to the penal approach, and from insanity and civilization to avant-garde literature, Foucault was once chuffed to reject outdated versions of considering and substitute them with clean types which are nonetheless being debated at the present time. a big impact on Queer conception and gender reviews (he was once brazenly homosexual and died of an AIDS-related ailment in 1984), he additionally wrote on structure, heritage, legislation, drugs, literature, politics, and naturally philosophy.

Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction

Not anyone has ever defined American democracy with extra actual perception or extra profoundly than Alexis de Tocqueville. After assembly with americans on huge travels within the usa, and severe learn of files and professionals, he authored the landmark Democracy in the USA, publishing its volumes in 1835 and 1840.

The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice

In a capitalist economic climate, taxes are an important software through which the political method places into perform a perception of monetary and distributive justice. Taxes arouse robust passions, fueled not just by means of conflicts of financial self-interest, yet through conflicting principles of equity. Taking as a tenet the traditional nature of personal estate, Murphy and Nagel convey how taxes can simply be evaluated as a part of the general method of estate rights that they assist to create.

Extra resources for Making History: Agency, Structure, and Change in Social Theory (Historical Materialism Books (Haymarket Books))

Show sample text content

240, 243. Ibid. , 244–5, 248. Marx, Capital, I, p. 899. a hundred • bankruptcy a significant measure by means of their position in social family members, no matter if one thinks of those family as constructions, associations, or no matter what. observe that the argument doesn't rely on any declare approximately members’ ideals being approximately, or formed by way of buildings. Elster himself emphasises that ‘methodological individualism holds in basic terms in extensional contexts. . . . humans usually have ideals approximately supra-individual entities that aren't reducible to ideals approximately individuals’. a hundred and fifty MI is ready what constructions are; it's completely in keeping with humans having (according to MI) fake, simply because collectivist, ideals approximately buildings. both, my argument for the ineliminability of constructions turns now not on people’s ideals approximately constructions, yet at the powers that they have got (and certainly could have with no understanding that they have got them). Elster’s reaction might, I think, be to argue that constructions empower in simple terms in as far as they're themselves the houses of people. Such, at any expense, is the impact conveyed via a few fresh, hugely compressed reviews at the declare that ‘structures . . . have causal efficacy’, the place a constitution is a ‘set of kin defined in abstraction from the specific relata’: ‘I disagree. . . . In extensional contexts, what has causal efficacy is a relation with its relata or, as I positioned it, people with their relational properties’. 151 Elster supplies no purposes for this declare that constitution conceived as a collection of empty locations could have no causal efficacy, whereas a dating among specific members does. both Elster is ignoring the salient old fact that humans often find themselves in patterned, persisting relationships to whose simple personality their person activities can ordinarily make little distinction, within which case it's tough to take him heavily, or he's engaged in a only verbal manoeuvre, calling buildings the homes of people, within which case he has nonetheless to come back up with an issue to teach that those disguised buildings don't have any causal efficacy. Lurking in the back of Elster’s admittedly imprecise comments could be the trust that constructions, the place now not conceived because the accidental outcomes of person activities, has to be a few kind of mysterious quasi-organic or non secular entity. yet this trust is fake. a wonderfully appropriate definition of constitution is equipped by way of Roy Bhaskar, who, like Giddens, conceives constitution as ‘both the ever-present situation (material reason) and the always reproduced end result of human agency’. 152 (Note one hundred fifty 151 152 Elster, Making feel, p. 6. Elster, ‘Reply to Comments’, Inquiry, 29, 1 (1986), p. sixty seven. R. Bhaskar, the potential of Naturalism (Brighton, 1979), p. forty three. constitution and motion • one hundred and one that this formula doesn't be afflicted by this type of ambiguity among reason and medium in the direction of which Giddens has a tendency. ) Bhaskar bargains the subsequent definition: ‘Society . . . is an articulated ensemble of trends and powers which, in contrast to common ones, exist purely so long as they (or at the very least a few of them) are being exercised; are exercised within the final example through the intentional job of guys; and aren't inevitably spacetime invariant’.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.74 of 5 – based on 44 votes